 |
| Fig. 1 |
In this series we are trying to figure out why dsDNA sequences in public databases, placed there by scientists, don't comply with Chargaff Rules.
We assume that they are dsDNA because human DNA is double stranded.
In today's appendices we analyze the same DNA we did in the previous post (Egyptian and Eurasian mummy samples).
In this post I present the results of a test I tried.
The purpose was to determine if the DNA of the genes between Promoters ("TATAAA") and Terminators ("TATCTC") would comply with Chargaff Rules because the first post data used all nucleotides, including promoters and terminators.
Today's appendices show the results, which are not determinitive (Appendix Egyptian, Appendix Eurasian).
More tests to follow.
Stay tuned.
The previous post in this series is here
No comments:
Post a Comment