Monday, June 6, 2011

Which Came First - Cyborg Or Robot? - 2

On this date in 2009 we first asked this question in the post Which Came First - Cyborg Or Robot?.

It is not as easy to answer as it appears to be at first blush.

So, the Ecocosmology Blog, using that Dredd Blog post as a springboard, took it a bit further in the post there entitled Putting A Face on Machine Mutation.

To complicate matters, in the post Will Humans Evolve Into Machines? the Ecocosmology Blog pointed out that there is a principle called Dollo's Law which says that evolution has only one direction, meaning there can be no "un-evolution", or reversal of the process.

So we must know which came first, the biological or the machine, because that determines the direction in which things must go.

Some scientists seem to think that money will solve the mystery, indicating that only the rich will have the money it takes to evolve into robots (Will Humans Evolve Into Machines?).

As we were wondering if it would help to ask "which came first machines or sex?", along came the post The Virgin MOMCOM - 2, setting forth leiolepis ngovantrii, a virgin lizard that gives birth without sexual encounter (leiolepis are all virgin females).

Is it any wonder that Dredd Blog then posted Absolutism: Pabulum For The Insecure?, a post questioning those who embrace absolutism like a clingy kid grasping his mother, or those "embracers" we wondered about in Thumb Sucking For Power And Pleasure who can't seem to give up thumb sucking?

Who knows, let's ask The 9/11 Commission of Bush II, since everyone knows that era was The Peak of Truth, and thus everyone in the MOMCOM media believes what they said. No? Or perhaps we could consider the journal American Behavioral Journal to beef up on some of the psychological manifestations in this tug-of-war involving a notion of human vs. machine?

Sunday, June 5, 2011

SCAD: The Four Illegal Wars

On the Dredd Blog Series: Multiple Posts Page (see Tabs at top of page) under the heading "SCAD (State Crimes Against Democracy)", we list various Dredd Blog posts that chronicle scholarly works which cover the SCAD subject in comprehensive detail.

A more recent Dredd Blog post covers "scientific" endeavors in this subject matter area, specifically, the horror that has happened in the USA under the power of the state misguided by pseudo science (see The Criminally Insane Epoch Arises - 2).

Before we turn to the specifics of today's post, think about the difference between State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD) and Individual Crimes Against Democracy (ICAD).

The rare case where an individual votes twice, once in her assigned precinct then in another precinct, is an example of an ICAD.

An ICAD in a democracy calls for a criminal charge.

In the case where the state commits crimes against democracy, likewise in a democracy, that also calls for a criminal charge.

We can logically deduce then: when there is no criminal charge for ICAD or SCAD, there is no democracy, there is instead the illusion of democracy.

The term sometimes applied to any such scenario, "banana republic", has nothing to do with the size or location of any such nation, it has to do with how that nation handles state crimes (see Democracy School & Too Big To Jail).

The ongoing four illegal USA wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya), which is the subject of today's post, are by definition, then, State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD):



The first lecture in the video, concerning the illegality of the Afghanistan War, is given by a professor who wrote what was awarded Publisher's Weekly "book of the week", which only 51 books a year receive (out of tens of thousands):
Web Pick of the Week

The New Pearl Harbor Revisited:
9/11, the Cover-Up, and the Exposé

David Ray Griffin. Interlink/Olive Branch,
$20 (386p) ISBN 9781566567299

Author and professor Griffin (9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press) knows his work is referred to by officials and the media as conspiracy theory, and he has a rebuttal: "the official theory is itself a conspiracy theory." In this companion volume to 2004's The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11, Griffin provides corrections, raises new issues and discusses "the two most important official reports about 9/11," the 9/11 Commission Report and the National Institute of Standards and Technology report on the Twin Towers, both "prepared by people highly responsive to the wishes of the White House" and riddled with "omission and distortion from beginning to end." Griffin addresses many points in exhaustive detail, from the physical impossibility of the official explanation of the towers' collapse to the Commission's failure to scrutinize the administration to the NIST's contradiction of its own scientists to the scads of eyewitness and scientific testimony in direct opposition to official claims. Citing hundreds, if not thousands, of sources, Griffin's detailed analysis is far from reactionary or delusional, building a case that, though not conclusive, raises enough valid and disturbing questions to make his call for a new investigation more convincing than ever. (Oct.)
(Publishers Weekly, 11/24/2008). On page two of that book, professor Howard Zinn, an American historian who wrote A People's History of The United States, is quoted:
David Ray Griffin has done admirable and painstaking research in reviewing the mysteries surrounding the 9-11 attacks. It is the most persuasive argument I have seen for further investigation of the Bush administration's relationship to that historic and troubling event.
(The New Pearl Harbor). The forward to the book was written by Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus of International Law and Practice at Princeton University and Distinguished Visiting Professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara.

The professor and professional author, Griffin, goes on to point out in later sections of the video lecture, that the media portion of MOMCOM never did any reviews of the book nor any interviews of him, which clearly shows their fear based allegiance to the propaganda of MOMCOM.

The video is in eight or so parts, so that when one part ends you can click on the message that indicates and commences the next section.

For those interested in the reason for the illegal wars, check out the series The Peak of The Oil Wars.

Saturday, June 4, 2011

A Tale of Coup Cities

Not entirely unlike A Tale of Two Cities the American people have been asked, in polls for a decade now, whether the country is going in the correct direction or not.

They have said consistently that the country has been going in the wrong direction.

Government keeps going in the policy direction which the people certainly do not approve of (that direction we call the "W" direction).

Logical deduction: the people are not the government.

The American people have been asked in polls, for a decade now, whether the country should be in all of these wars or not.

The people have said the wars are improper and unwanted.

Government keeps going in the war direction which the people do not approve of.

Logical deduction: the people are not the government.

The founding Americans believed that war was a toxic disease, the current powers that be teach in the war colleges that war is an art.

So who is the government?

Logical deduction: those who want war, not peace.

We have stated that a "gentle coup" has taken place whereby MOMCOM is the actual government, that the politicians are mere actors carrying out the onion script, all in the name of the art of Sun Tzu.

That too is a logical deduction.


Friday, June 3, 2011

Bush II Eradicated The Robber Barons - 3

In the first and second posts in this series we pointed out some of what many will want to call the "Christian - like Parameters" for the beginning of The Age of Plunder within the USA.

In the recent post Is War An Art or Is War A Disease we pointed out that the military has won the war against the USA, by using the tactics of a Chinese General written down in his "Bible of war".

That book has been spread throughout the Military War Colleges in the USA and around "the world according to MOMCOM" (click on the graphic above for a larger view of that world).

That Chinese General always said that the better practice, when taking over a nation, is to do so without doing military damage to it.

The better tactic, according to those Chinese war philosophies, is to instead use deceit and propaganda to "win the hearts and minds" of the enemy nation.

The Chinese philosophy that war is an art composed primarily of deceit and propaganda is the thesis upon which The War Colleges of MOMCOM teach their students (a.k.a. "heroes" or "warriors").

We have pointed out previously that the western military religion is really Mithraism, and we pointed out their "Far Eastern Bible" in Is War an Art or Is War a Disease, linked to above.

Since world-grade fine art is quite expensive, and the graphic above shows the worldwide scope of MOMCOM's art of war, it is not much of an exercise to realize that vast sums of money had to be piped to MOMCOM's many "sub-COMs" around the world.

And that piping of money had to be unfettered by any quaint Constitutional or Statutory constraints.

We refer you to this post and this post on Washington's Blog for some of the detail about how the money is shipped there, and simply ask that, while reading those posts, you remember that the relevant banks the treasury money is going to are international banks, both in scope and in ideology.

So, when funds are loaned to them by the USA fed at 0% here, which they then loan back to the government at 3%, that generates "money" which is then available for all of their foreign outlets in foreign nations too.

Can anyone say "theft by deception", plunder, or "money laundering?"

You can also read more on the "Series: Multiple Posts" page under the heading "PLUNDER".

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Lifting The Government Surplus Ceiling

In our wartocracy, "government surplus" is old Army garbage.

What if government surplus meant that the government was spending less than it was taking in?

Could the politicians handle it?

It would mean that addiction to oil had ended rendering the oil wars obsolete.

It would mean that the middle class was strong.

And it would mean that the economy would be more stable.

Just sayin' ...

It was the Bush II regime that lowered the government budget surplus ceiling that the Bill Clinton Administration had raised.

In fact, Bush II lowered it so low they had to dig a deeper hole for the new basement to hold all the war debt.

We now seem to habitually follow The W Direction (War) into more debt.

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Is War An Art or Is War A Disease?

The founders of The United States of America, especially the one who wrote The Bill of Rights, and is called "the father of the Constitution", declared that war is a disease.

Not only had he been in on the very beginning of the nation, on getting it off to a good start, later he was in the Cabinet of a president, as Secretary of State.

As if that was not enough, later he was elected by his constituents to be in the congress for a while.

Then, to top it all off the people even elected him to be President of the United States of America!

Collecting his thoughts after that experience, yes, collecting his thoughts about the most wonderful essence any nation can have, public liberty, he declared:
Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied : and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manners and of morals, engendered by both. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare. Those truths are well established.
(The Greatest Source of Power Toxins?, emphasis added). To the first Americans, war is the greatest enemy of public liberty, because it is the carrier of the germs of every other sick enemy of public liberty.

If that saying of James Madison is a true saying, since we have had open warfare for the past decade, would that be enough time to test the Madison hypothesis a bit?

Lets get right to the gist of it by analyzing some recent comments by those who spend their entire lives in war or in the preparation for war:
The notion of using martial law (a technique abandoned just before WWI replacing it with the propaganda technique) to keep the people in their place, has been openly contemplated by the military:
A new report by the U.S. Army War College talks about the possibility of Pentagon resources and troops being used should the economic crisis lead to civil unrest, such as protests against businesses and government or runs on beleaguered banks.

“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” said the War College report.

The study says economic collapse, terrorism and loss of legal order are among possible domestic shocks that might require military action within the U.S.
(Phoenix Biz Journal). The plans are in place, they are simply waiting for the people to get fed up so they can fed up.
(The Government of The Government, emphasis added). The plans are in place and will be used if what they consider to be too many people complaining (about the economic state of affairs, in a manner they do not like) should take place?

That sounds sick to me.

The U.S. Army War College no longer teaches that war is the worst disease, it now teaches that "war is an art", yes, they see themselves as masters of war, masters of fine art.

And these war colleges cost big bucks, weapons cost big bucks, wars cost big bucks, preparing for war costs big bucks, so like a Monet or a Van Gogh, art costs big bucks.

And if there isn't enough to go around after all the art of war is funded, if you complain about it The U.S. Amy War College will send an art brigade your way so you can learn to appreciate their art, or else.

Ok, one more, then lets go back outside and play pretend everything is hunky dory in the Absolute USA:
Pentagonia, capitol of Bullshitistan, well aware of the current political climate, has declared who its greatest enemy is, believing it is health care:
The U.S. military keeps searching the horizon for a peer competitor, the challenger that must be taken seriously. Is it China? What about an oil rich and resurgent Russia?

But the threat that is most likely to hobble U.S. military capabilities is not a peer competitor, rather it is health care.
(The Enemy the Pentagon Should Fear Most: Health Care, National Defense Magazine). We have been pointing out this very strange ideology for a while now, using "MOMCOM" symbolism to isolate the militant energy fighting against the middle class and poor in the United States.
(Deja Vu - Guns v. Butter Election Looms, emphasis added). You might be wondering how this "war is art" meme began.

It began with the teachings of a Chinese general who wrote a book "The Art of War" which eventually found its way into the libraries of The U.S. Army War Colleges.

It then infected the minds of the students of war, the "artists" who do war, who once upon a time would have been doctors learning how to prevent the disease of war.

Now, instead they get a degree in the Chinese philosophy, not the original American philosophy:
Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.

Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.

...

3. The art of war, then, is governed by five constant factors, to be taken into account in one's deliberations, when seeking to determine the conditions obtaining in the field.

4. These are: (1) The Moral Law; (2) Heaven; (3) Earth; (4) The Commander; (5) Method and discipline.

5,6. The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives, undismayed by any danger.

7. Heaven signifies night and day, cold and heat, times and seasons.

8. Earth comprises distances, great and small; danger and security; open ground and narrow passes; the chances of life and death.

9. The Commander stands for the virtues of wisdom, sincerely, benevolence, courage and strictness.

10. By method and discipline are to be understood the marshaling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the graduations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and the control of military expenditure.

11. These five heads should be familiar to every general: he who knows them will be victorious; he who knows them not will fail.
(The Art of War, see also this, this, and this). So, since your health is their enemy then you are their enemy, and since art is expensive, if you complain in the streets about not having a home, job, or food, they will capture your country whole and intact, because that is considered to be supreme excellence in their "art of war".

Remember their "art" dictates:
"The Moral Law causes the people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that they will follow him regardless of their lives ...

The Commander stands for the virtues of wisdom, sincerely, benevolence, courage and strictness ...

By method and discipline are to be understood the marshaling of the army in its proper subdivisions, the graduations of rank among the officers, the maintenance of roads by which supplies may reach the army, and the control of military expenditure."
(ibid, links added). That the art of war even controls the building of the roads explains a lot about our infrastructure?

Yeah, James Madison, I get your drift.