![]() |
| Fig. 1 Harvard Eugenics Era |
I am sure that some are asking why Dredd Blog criticizes "known solid science".
The answer is that even though a hypothesis like a "global thermolhaline conveyor" is believed to exist by many, so were other scientific hypotheses in scientific journals, science textbooks, and university curricula that proved not to exist (see Fig. 1).
The first video below is another example.
And religions have the same problem that manifests itself after millions accept a hypothesis as true.
The second video below is yet another example.
But the main reason long-held scientific dogma is falsifiable is when new evidence falsifies the dogma.
The next post in this series is here, the previous post in this series is here.

Also: "The mystery of why the last million or so years of glacial variability are so different to what came before just got more mysterious" (The Puzzling Pleistocene).
ReplyDeleteI noticed that they did not use the words "photon", "potential enthalpy", or "TEOS-10" in that paper. Reminds me of the Dredd Blog series "In Search of Ocean Heat" and "The Photon Current". And the old proverb "you can't find what you don't know what to look for" ...
Delete