|"Your Interrogator is here"|
That is because the movie Zero Dark Thirty (ZDT, hereinafter ZERO) is made from the blood of Oil-Qaeda, which the Department of Energy has called the lifeblood of American economy.
Thank you Academy for not giving ZERO the jingoistic inglorious propaganda review trash that a lot of reviewers gave it.
Oh how the propagandists lobbied the movie reviewer clan of McTell News.
As a result of those warmonger perks, those reviewers said ZERO was to be the movie of the year, blah blah blah, but instead ZERO got a dose of what it deserves for piously worshiping The Bully Religion on steroids, mixed with a lot of crack:
Just a few months ago, the consensus of the establishment press and the nation's (shockingly large) community of film critics was that Zero Dark Thirty was the best film of the year and the clear (and well-deserved) front-runner to win the most significant Academy Awards. "OK, folks, you can plan something else for Oscar Night 2013 . . . . Zero Dark Thirty will win Best Picture and Best Director (Kathryn Bigelow)," pronounced Time Magazine's Richard Corliss. "'Zero Dark Thirty' and Kathryn Bigelow won major critics' prizes on Sunday, confirming the Osama bin Laden manhunt thriller as an Oscar frontrunner," said Entertainment Weekly. The film "looks like the movie to beat right now" as the critics' awards "landscape is dominated by Kathryn Bigelow's 'Zero Dark Thirty,'" reported the Washington Post's Jen Chaney.(Guardian). I like what Chris Hayes said about it, the film colludes with evil; and it is some of the most sicko psychopathic jingoistic babble ever to have wasted money, time, as well as what we have remaining of our national reputation.
But then political writers had begun to notice what film critics either failed to detect or just wilfully ignored. The film falsely depicted torture as instrumental in the finding of Osama bin Laden ("what is so unsettling about 'Zero Dark Thirty' is not that it tells this difficult history but, rather, that it distorts it", said the New Yorker's Jane Mayer). Beyond the torture falsehoods, it was a blatant vehicle for CIA propaganda, bolstering a worldview exclusively out of Langley ("This is not a coincidence. The CIA played a key role in shaping the film's narrative," reported BuzzFeed's Michael Hastings; the CIA "couldn't have asked for better product placement", said the New York Times' Timothy Egan; as a result, said The Atlantic's Peter Maass: "Zero Dark Thirty represents a new genre of embedded filmmaking that is the problematic offspring of the worrisome endeavor known as embedded journalism"). In sum, said MSNBC's Chris Hayes, the film "colludes with evil" (a long but very partial list of writers, filmmakers, FBI agents and even government officials who similarly denounced the film is here).
(I'm actually glad that it won essentially half of an award, for sound editing, as that's somehow more cruel than if it just won nothing).
This is a rare case of some justice being done. There's little question that the objections to its pro-torture depictions and CIA propaganda were what sunk the film.
Regular readers know that Dredd Blog has pointed out the scourge of government propaganda over and over again for years (Propaganda Is A "Toxic Asset", 3/21/09; Exceptional American Propaganda Inspired NAZI Goebbels, 1/25/12; and The Virgin MOMCOM - 6, 1/31/13; to name a few).
I will boycott ZERO in the future as I have in the past.