Thursday, April 25, 2024

Dept. of Justice Conspiracy Theories - 5

"The king can do no wrong"
This series is about official conspiracy theories (Dept. of Justice Conspiracy Theories, 2, 3, 4), not those unapproved ones scolded by the commercial mass media (On The Origin of "Conspiracy Theory", 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). 

This post in this series is about the related subject of an "un-indicted co-conspirator"

"a person who is named in an indictment as one who took part in a conspiracy to commit a crime but who is not charged in the indictment

The most famous, of course, is the Watergate grand jury's naming of President Richard Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in a conspiracy to cover up the Watergate burglary"

(Merriam-Webster). Recent criminal indictments are not all "don't ask, don't tell" about what official conspiracy theories of late reveal to us.

So, let's put two and two together ("to make a correct guess based on what one has seen or heard : to figure something out") because it reveals that SOME ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!

The commercial mass-media is so all a-flutter that it is throwing "no one is above the law" around like it was a known known.

But let's put it together like honesty was still worth something:

"The concept of criminal conspiracy has its earliest roots in fourteenth century English common law. At that time, it saw limited use as a legal theory. It became more broadly applied in the United States in the nineteenth century, though still the scope of prosecutions was not wide. Today, however, conspiracy is a far-reaching legal principle, embracing antitrust actions, an enormous number of more traditional criminal cases, and even tort lawsuits. It is the basis of prosecutions dealing with, among other crimes, drug violations, securities fraud, murder for hire, bank robbery, and extortion."

... Conspiracy is an agreement by two or more people to commit a crime."

(Dept. of Justice Conspiracy Theories, Dredd Blog 2010). Note that in recent indictments you will read "un-indicted CO-CONSPIRATOR", which means that this person is not being indicted even though they agreed "to commit a crime" with others who are being indicted for the same agreement to commit a crime.

For instance, Michael Cohen was put in prison for entering into a conspiracy to commit a crime with candidate Donald J. Trump, who was an unindicted co-conspirator (Cohen Plea Deal). 

In other words candidate Trump was above the law but Cohen wasn't.

That hidden in plain sight form of exposing propaganda (The Ways of Bernays) where two or more people agree with one another to commit a crime but one of them is above the law (unindicted) continues unabated to this very day (e.g. Michigan, Arizona).

The case in the US Supreme Court where arguments were held today was an argument over whether or not the former US president (and all US presidents) are above the law (should be unindited).

"We're writing a rule for the ages," conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, said during the arguments": US Supreme Court justices in Trump case lean toward some level of immunity.

Way too many officials in the USA are above the law:

"The Government presents an impressive array of theories which would preclude it from any liability ... we ... hold that the Government should escape unscathed ... It is often said that the doctrine of sovereign immunity is a derivative of the common law maxim "The King can do no wrong." But conceptually it is far older. Zeus himself carried an aegis or breastplate, a buckler, and a thunderbolt which made him, the mythological sovereign, immune from all that could beset him. And common law provided its sovereign with the immunity of Zeus ... The tide of history is running clearly against the concept of sovereign immunity. The disfavor into which the doctrine has fallen was observed as far back as ... 1939 ... [and] this Court pointed out that the assault upon the citadel of immunity continues presently apace.

(The Battle of Immunities & Diseases; cf Sovereign Impunity: A Child of the Supreme People; Will The Military Become The Police?, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13; Follow The Immunity, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).

We are at the point that historians have pointed out is the end of the line ("wherever law ends, tyranny begins” (John Locke, 1689):

But always TCS [the creep state] is primarily the population segment diagnosed as a despotic minority which the once most-often-quoted historian, Toynbee, fingered as one of the members of the trinity of extinction that he found in all civilizations that were about to become very successful at becoming extinct:
That something is the dementia that produces and ends up in suicide:
"In other words, a society does not ever die 'from natural causes', but always dies from suicide or murder --- and nearly always from the former, as this chapter has shown."
(A Study of History, by Arnold J. Toynbee). There is no cure for the final symptom of that group dementia, there is only prevention by way of avoiding it altogether in the first place.

The components of that group dementia were pointed out in an encyclopedia piece concerning that historian quoted above:
"In the Study Toynbee examined the rise and fall of 26 civilizations in the course of human history, and he concluded that they rose by responding successfully to challenges under the leadership of creative minorities composed of elite leaders. Civilizations declined when their leaders stopped responding creatively, and the civilizations then sank owing to the sins of nationalism, militarism, and the tyranny of a despotic minority. "
(Encyclopedia Britannica, emphasis added). The show stopper, in terms of remedy, in this type of group dementia is that it is a contagious dementia.
(Etiology of Social Dementia - 18). That particular "minority" is not a racial or ethnic minority, rather, it is primarily composed of a destructive suicidal trance (Choose Your Trances Carefully, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).

(Arrested Development: The Creep State). The long and the short of it is that cultures devolve over and over again because bad choices exceed good choices.

(How To Enjoy The End Of Bad Choices). They are selling postcards of the hanging of the Constitution.

The previous post in this series is here.



1 comment:

  1. Anyone paying attention is well aware of the duplicity and fact that the privileged, wealthy and famous are held to entirely different standards. The asinine antics of the Traitor In Chief only reinforced what we already knew to be true.

    Democracy and justice are not what they pretend to be. Democracy for who? Justice when? These are simply catch-all terms to deflect the ugly reality that so-called "rights and privileges for thee" are not the same as the "rights and privileges for me".

    Toss is the clearly criminal and partisan Supreme pretenders and the illusions are vaporized, especially if you happen to be a woman. Only the most obtuse can't see it, however we have a lot of those too.

    The system is likely irrevocably broken, but the calls for civil war absolutely won't fix it, or the return to a religious cult of stupidstitions and connedspiracy nonsense.

    I wish I had answers, but absolutely don't, just disgust. I'm in good company.

    ReplyDelete