Junk DNA R Us - 2

A Prescient Author

In a recent post I pointed out that gathering DNA and putting its description into GenBank is no easy task:

"In virology, the acquisition of genomes science has many nomenclature problems...

I say that because among other things:

"At least six small alternative-frame open reading frames (ORFs) overlapping well-characterized SARS-CoV-2 genes have been hypothesized to encode accessory proteins. Researchers have used different names for the same ORF or the same name for different ORFs, resulting in erroneous homological and functional inferences." 

(Conflicting and ambiguous names ... in the SARS-CoV-2 genome). There are several reasons for the phenomena, besides inferior nomenclature practices:

"1) technicians improperly collected otherwise good samples, 
2) technicians were given bad samples,
3) chemicals damaged the host cell causing chimeric hosts and/or viruses,
4) proton tunneling caused a mutation,
5) natural change took place."

(On The Origin Of The Home Of COVID-19 - 31). We should also note that if the host bacteria is not known it adds to the problem:

"Easy to see though, plaque as­says for counting phages do not work if ... the host bacteria are ... not known."

 (Polony Method, emphasis added). Time after time the SARS-CoV-2 host cell/microbe is never mentioned ... instead the meta-host ("host of the host") is mentioned (e.g. human, mink, bat, etc.).

Over and over, someone has to waste some time to figure out what is up with all of these "different samenesses" in the data that finds its way into GenBank and similar repositories.

Imagine the confusion that is caused if we take too much for granted:

"Obtaining virus genome sequence directly from clinical samples is still a challenging task due to the low load of virus genetic material compared to the host DNA, and to the difficulty to get an accurate genome assembly."

(A complete protocol for whole-genome sequencing). NOTE: That is a problem even when a pure sample of genetic material is at hand, because it is a problem if the host is not known and therefore not described."

(On The Origin of the Genes of Viruses - 18). The contents of a GenBank GBFF file or a FASTA file supports that perspective because they contain 'strange' letters beyond the "ACGTU" letters of normal DNA/RNA nomenclature.

I detailed those 'strange letters' in the first post of this series:

"Today I have prepared some evidence and placed it into several appendices.

The effort I have put forth is directed at discovering any anomalies in the GenBank files.

These anomalies I will talk about in today's post are real in the sense that they should not be there.

Some of them take place at the microbe destruction phase, others take place at the collection of the DNA/RNA phase, and most may take place during the analysis phase.

First, remember that only 'A', 'C', 'G', or 'T' letters should appear in the base pairs of the about thirty thousand letter nucleotide [DNA] data (IUPAC nomenclature allows "it could be this,that, or the other" letters into the nomenclature because the equipment used is not flawless)."

(Junk DNA R Us). The presence of those letters tells us that the DNA/RNA collection process is not flawless:

"These letters represent multiple bases and can be polymorphisms or mutations and are important or just area of poor sequencing and are telling you to not trust sequence in this area if there are many Ns. Either way they are possibly important and should either be left alone or your sequencing improved if there are too many as the best way of dealing with them. Ns at the very beginning of the sequence and when the sequence is finished at the end of the sequence are not important."

(University College London, emphasis added). That is why I called them "it could be this, that, or the other" letters.

The take home from this is that big pharma bought and paid for researchers and technicians who use an inordinate quantity of metaphorical play pretend to cover over what they don't know but want us to believe (The Doll As Metaphor, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).

"Technocracy itself is an immortality ideology" so there has to be a lot of Bernays sauce in it (The Machine Religion).

The prescient author pictured and linked to at the top of this post wrote about chimeric producing events which current genetic Frankensteins are gleefully producing.

These microbial monsters are more real than the one Shelly wrote about in her book (On The Origin Of The Home Of COVID-19, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31).

Meanwhile ... Extreme Life.

The next post in this series is here, the previous post in this series is here.