Pages

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

It's In The GenBank - 5

Fig. 1 The Real RNA
I have been wondering why the GenBank's "FASTA" format is more preferred than the GBFF format.

I recently decided to use it as the main format for translating DNA segments into mRNA, codons, and amino acids.

Among other things, the GBFF format has errors in its references to genes (e.g. "gene 687..3158"), mRNA, and CDS.
 
Many of those indicators don't match up with the results when using the technique in the video I displayed below.

That very informative video displayed at the end of this post indicates how translation is done by hand.

Translating by hand is ok for a few lines of DNA, but there are an incredible number of lines in human chromosomes.
 
It would take an inordinate amount of time to translate them by hand (for example: 22 human chromosomes from a GenBank FASTA file is 2.8 gigabytes in size; the GBFF is even larger).

So, I engineered some software to prepare for "the ribosome job":

"Within all cells, the translation machinery resides within a specialized organelle called the ribosome. In eukaryotes, mature mRNA molecules must leave the nucleus and travel to the cytoplasm, where the ribosomes are located. On the other hand, in prokaryotic organisms, ribosomes can attach to mRNA while it is still being transcribed. In this situation, translation begins at the 5' end of the mRNA while the 3' end is still attached to DNA.

In all types of cells, the ribosome is composed of two subunits: the large (50S) subunit and the small (30S) subunit (S, for svedberg unit, is a measure of sedimentation velocity and, therefore, mass). Each subunit exists separately in the cytoplasm, but the two join together on the mRNA molecule. The ribosomal subunits contain proteins and specialized RNA molecules—specifically, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA). The tRNA molecules are adaptor molecules—they have one end that can read the triplet code in the mRNA through complementary base-pairing, and another end that attaches to a specific amino acid (Chapeville et al., 1962; Grunberger et al., 1969). The idea that tRNA was an adaptor molecule was first proposed by Francis Crick, co-discoverer of DNA structure, who did much of the key work in deciphering the genetic code (Crick, 1958).

Fig. 2 Genetic Code Perspective

Within the ribosome, the mRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA complexes are held together closely, which facilitates base-pairing. The rRNA catalyzes the attachment of each new amino acid to the growing chain."

(Nature, Translation: DNA to mRNA to Protein). I will point out one atomic aspect of the process later on.

I has to do with thymine being converted to uracil during the process:

"Like , is a linear made of four different types of subunits linked together by phosphodiester bonds (Figure 6-4). It differs from DNA chemically in two respects: (1) the nucleotides in RNA are ribonucleotides—that is, they contain the ribose (hence the name ribo) rather than deoxyribose; (2) although, like DNA, RNA contains the bases adenine (A), guanine (), and cytosine (C), it contains the uracil (U) instead of the thymine (T) in DNA. Since U, like T, can base-pair by hydrogen-bonding with A (Figure 6-5), the base-pairing properties described for DNA in Chapters 4 and 5 apply also to RNA (in RNA, G pairs with C, and A pairs with U). It is not uncommon, however, to find other types of base pairs in RNA: for example, G pairing with U occasionally."

(Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition). As I have written previously, the GenBank nomenclature does not distinguish between thymine ("T") and uracil ("U") (It's In The GenBank - 4). 

I added a feature to the software I engineered, which is the addition of the atomic nomenclature of the codons.

Anyway, the next step after converting the 'five-prime' (5`) and 'three-prime' (3`) segments (strands) into mRNA format codons ("U" for uracil, see Fig. 1 above).

Those codons can then be used to determine the amino acid using the Genetic Code (see Fig. 2).

As I said, I added the atomic nomenclature).

Here is an example from the software's analysis of chromosome 1:

output-files/chr1_fna.html

processing: >CM000663.2 Homo sapiens chromosome 1:
GRCh38 reference primary assembly

strand_53 ok, strand_35 ok, mRNAstrand ok


valid codons (codons in the Genetic Code):

AUG,CAU,CUU,CAC,UCC,CUC,AGA,AGG,AGG,CUC,
AGA,UGA,AGG,CUG,UCA,AGU,UAG,AGC,CUG,UCC,
AGC,AGA,CUG,AGA,AGA,UGA,CUG,CUC,CUA,CUG,
UUG,AGG,CUG,UAA,
AUG,CAU,CUU,CAC,UCC,CUC,AGA,AGG,AGG,CUC,
AGA,AGG,CUG,UCA,AGU,AGC,CUG,UCC,AGC,AGA,
CUG,AGA,AGA,CUG,CUC,CUA,CUG,UUG,AGG,CUG,
AUG,CUG,AGG,AGG,AGA,AGU,AGU,CGU,AGA,AAU,
AUG,CAU,UGA,CUU,AGG,CUC,UCU,CAU,AGG,AGG,
CUU,CUC,CUG,CAC,CUU,CUU,AGA,AGC,CAU,CUG,
CUA,CUG,CUA,UAA,
AUG,CUG,AGG,AGG,AGA,AGU,AGU,CGU,AGA,AAU,
AUG,CAU,CUU,AGG,CUC,UCU,CAU,AGG,AGG,CUU,
CUC,CUG,CAC,CUU,CUU,AGA,AGC,CAU,CUG,CUA,
CUG,CUA,
AUG,CUG,UUG,UCA,UCU,UCC,UGA,UUG,CUC,
AUG,CUG,UUG,UCA,UCU,UCC,UUG,CUC,

amino acids:

MHLHSLRRRLR
RLSS
SLSSRLRR
LLLLLRL
MLRRRSSRRNMH
LRLSHRRLLLHLLRSHLLLL
MLLSSS
LL

molecule content (no duplicates):

(MET) C5H11NO2S, (HIS) C6H9N3O2, (SER) C3H7NO3
(ARG) C6H14N4O2, (ASN) C4H8N2O3, (LEU) C6H13NO2,
(TYR) C9H11NO3

codon mutations (no duplicates):

GGU,CCC,CAG,GCC,GGC,CAA,GAA,UGG,ACC,UGU,
GCA,CCA,GCU,GUC,GAC,GGG,GAG,AAG,GGA,UGC,
CCU,GAU,ACA,GUG,AAA,AUU,CCG,AUC,UUC,GCG,
ACU,ACG,UUU,

(Excerpts from chromosome 1). The molecular descriptions in the "molecule content" section are in red letters and digits ; the abbreviations mean: (MET="Methionine", HIS="Histidine", SER="Serine", ARG="Arginine", ASN="Asparagine", LEU="Leucine", and TYR="Tyrosine").

In the "valid codons" section the start and stop codons are in bold letters.

Notice that the software I engineered separates the mutant codons and places them into the "codon mutations" section of the analysis (only one copy of each mutant is displayed).

Proton tunneling has been a suspect in mutant phenomena for some time, so the "codon mutations" section is not useless (The Doll As Metaphor - 4).

More discussion of that and other issues will be forthcoming in future posts in this Dredd Blog series.

The next post in this series is here, the previous post in this series is here.


Translation and transcription video:


No comments:

Post a Comment